Potenza is best selected at a clinic that diagnoses your concern such as acne scars or pores and your skin type, then determines the needle type and depth accordingly[1][2]. This is because the treatment uses a needle to deliver heat and can adjust both the skin layer reached and the temperature.[1]. Complications are reported to be uncommon, but not zero, and depending on your skin condition, you may decide to postpone the treatment.[1][2].
Do they choose the needle type and depth based on your concern?
First, you should look for whether they explain the settings based on your concern. A radiofrequency (RF) heat delivery treatment using a needle can reportedly adjust both the targeted skin layer and temperature. The way heat is delivered also varies depending on the needle type, such as uninsulated needles where heat emanates from the entire needle surface.[1]. The way heat is delivered also varies depending on the needle type, such as uninsulated needles where heat emanates from the entire needle surface.[1].
Acne scars, pore size, skin firmness—even with the same device, settings change depending on which concern you want to target most. Share your primary goal with the doctor at the start.
Could you explain the difference from laser?
A comparison with other treatments may be a key point to look for. In a study comparing left and right sides of the face in 30 acne scar patients, the effect of Potenza (same type of treatment) and fractional carbon dioxide laser were roughly equal[3]. On top of that, the Potenza side showed milder redness and pigment changes, with faster recovery[3].
In a study reviewing 397 patients in Thailand, at 6 months post-treatment, 88.1% on the RF side and 71.9% on the laser side showed at least 25% improvement in acne scars[4]. However, the difference was not clear-cut, and the RF side experienced stronger pain[4]. Be sure to ask about pain management options as well.
How much downtime is explained?
Immediately after the treatment, many people experience redness and swelling. In a 20-person trial, bleeding during the procedure, redness, and puffiness occurred in all participants, and petechial bruising appeared in 7 people.[5].
In another study, common side effects were temporary redness, swelling, and flushing, which resolved naturally within 24 hours.[6]Some reports indicate that combining medications increased efficacy, but these were small studies.[7]If you add medications, ask what is being used and why.
Which skin conditions warrant avoiding this treatment?
Depending on your skin condition, it may be best to postpone treatment. Dermatology textbooks list the following as conditions requiring careful consideration for treatments that resurface the skin: those who underwent intensive treatment within 3–12 months, those prone to hypertrophic scarring, and those with rosacea (facial flushing), dermatitis, or vitiligo.[2].
Possible complications include prolonged redness, uneven skin color or texture, infection, delayed healing, and scarring.[2]Verify that the clinic conducts a detailed medical history covering your previous treatments and skin conditions.
Where should I go? Guidelines for when you're unsure
During consultation, ask about the following points:
Settings: Will they explain the needle type and depth based on your concern?[1]
Comparison: Will they discuss how this differs from other treatments like laser?[3][4]
Downtime: Will they tell you how long redness, swelling, or bruising may persist?[5][6]
Medical history: Will they confirm your recent treatment history and any skin conditions?[2]
The right needle type, depth, and number of sessions for your skin cannot be determined from an article alone. During your consultation, discuss your main concern and treatment history with the physician, and together decide on the settings and downtime.
- 1Zhang B, Tan X, Zhang Q, Wu M. The Landscape of Radiofrequency Technology for Skin Rejuvenation. Health Science Reports. 2025. doi:10.1002/hsr2.71575
- 2Bolognia Dermatology, 5th ed. Chapter 154 Chemical and Mechanical Skin Resurfacing (The degree of improvement, recovery period, and likelihood of complications are proportional to the depth of skin injury and skin type. Complications include prolonged erythema, uneven pigmentation or texture, infection, delayed healing, and scarring. Relative contraindications include moderate to deep resurfacing within 3–12 months, propensity for hypertrophic scarring, history of radiation therapy, rosacea, dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, and similar conditions).
- 3Le QU, Sha SHA, Chundi HE, Chen HD, Wu Y. Comparison of Non-insulated Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency and Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Facial Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Pilot Randomized Split-face Clinical Study. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2025. doi:10.2340/actadv.v105.43611
- 4Yan C, Phinyo P, Yogya Y, Chuamanochan M, Wanitphakdeedecha R. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Fractional Laser and Fractional Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Retrospective Propensity Score Analysis. Life. 2025. doi:10.3390/life15091379
- 5Wu X, Zhang Z, Zhu J, Lu S, Chen C, Wu X, Wang X, Zhao Z. Can Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency System Treatment Impair the Skin Barrier Function in Chinese Patients? A Prospective Clinical Trial. Dermatology and Therapy. 2022. doi:10.1007/s13555-022-00807-w
- 6Malarz D, Czyżewski Ł, Olczak-Kowalczyk D. Microneedle radiofrequency for skin rejuvenation: bridging image-derived metrics and photographic assessment. Frontiers in Medicine. 2025. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1710949
- 7Lyu J, Jiang L, Tang M, Zheng L, Liu S. Microneedle fractional radiofrequency associated with drug delivery for facial atrophic acne scars and skin rejuvenation. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2024. doi:10.1080/14764172.2024.2372342